Tag Archives: analysis

Good writers just want to have fun

17 Feb

So tonight I went to see a movie with a friend and some friends of hers I’d never met before. One of the girls is studying English and Political Science (I think)–basically pre-law. We sort of talked about our similar interests in English before the movie, so that was kind of our connection after just meeting each other. I should have expected that after the movie, we would have a conversation about meaningful things regarding the movie (because that is pretty typical for English majors or anyone associated with the College of Liberal Arts, really).

So after the movie, my friend and the English major were standing in the hallway, waiting for the others to take a restroom break, and of course we were talking about the movie. Then the English major began to talk about how she saw the movie as an analogy to our society. Being the nerd that I am, I appreciated the things she was saying, and I had my own similar thoughts about the movie myself; But I also came to a realization in that moment…

There are two types of English majors–

ones that analyze post-entertainment, and ones that analyze as entertainment.

I am not the latter.

I have a tendency to experience every story I ever read (or write), every movie I ever see, and every thing I ever do for what it’s worth. Then (and not long afterward), I process it all logically, draw meaning from it like I’m a super concept magnet, form a deeper understanding of it all, and then I craft those mega thoughts into words that usually turn out much better on paper.

Looking back, this is something I noticed about many of my classmates in college, and I kind of wished I could have been like them. They seemed quick and well put-together, and it felt like it took me more time and energy to produce the level of thoughts they had. But then sometimes I realized that I actually had more to say, and what I had to say was my own genuine thought or opinion–something that is easier for other people… ordinary people… to relate to. In other words, I think this actually made me….

a better writer, perhaps.

I mean, isn’t that what “good writers” are?– people who write in such a way that has the power to capture the minds of all? That seems to be the way we have defined it, regardless of whatever trends and guidelines befall the worlds of literature and pop culture.

Anyway, that is my thought for the day. Maybe it will inspire someone. :)


For Smarters

3 Feb

Ever had to read something immensely complex and then try to explain it, whether orally or in a loathsome paper?

This basically defines technical and professional communication. A technical and professional communicator is much like a filter, working between two or among several different subject matter experts and audiences. This can get a little crazy. Handling information for various groups of people can be a lot like handling a bunch of out-of-control children on sugar highs. College gave me some courses that embraced this kind of responsibility and taught me how to deal with information mentally–how to receive it, understand it, sift through it, organize it, and communicate it.

One of my literature classes  focused on topics of medicine in literature. After the first day, I was sure the class was going to be interesting, but I also thought it was going to be just another class. I had no idea what was ahead for me.

Aside from the…I don’t know–1 million (give or take)–articles we had to read…here are a few of the novels we were required to read for the class:

The Hot Zone

The Emperor of All Maladies

Mountains Beyond Mountains


All of theses books are outstanding, by the way! I especially loved The Emperor of All Maladies. :)

Unfortunately, there was so much reading to do for just this one class (and I was taking several literature classes during that fully loaded semester), so I didn’t actually get to finish reading all of them on time. However, they all made a huge impact on my understanding of the medical industry–from its history, to it’s connection with other fields, to its influence on people’s personal lives and even the shaping of entire cultures.

For example, I had no idea that pharmacists and chemists have had a history of being at odds with one another and that there are political implications as well which have had the potential to create shifts among professionals to the point that science as we know it can be altered. These are the kinds of things that are not talked about freely, especially if it means an entire country can be at stake. Not that there are any conspiracies, but after learning about the webs of communication and involvement within the medical industry and field of science as a whole, I certainly believe there are dirty under-the-table kinds of things that occur in our medical world today that (medically related or not) have significant consequences for people all over the world.

In other words, this class totally blew my mind. And so did the introduction to Elaine Scarry’s book The Body in Pain. I was assigned to write an 8-10-page-long paper with three concentrations on this introduction–a critical précis (which I’d never even heard of before!), an analysis, and a discussion.

It was so hard!

But in the end, I learned a lot about pain–from its contributing factors to its nature and its consequences. I was overwhelmed with insight just from reading and understanding Scarry’s introduction, so it was a powerful experience to be able to write a paper which regurgitated the things she had proposed in her writing in a way that could be easily understood by someone who was not a professional–someone who was not the doctor or a philosopher that she was. I felt honored!

So no wonder technical communicators don’t get much credit for what they do…because it’s already a major reward to just be the technical communicator!